Gravity as Energy-Time Flow
Abstract:
Gravity, an invisible force shaping the cosmos, has intrigued humanity for centuries. From the moon’s tug on the tides to the dance of black holes, gravity orchestrates the universe’s symphony. This thesis explores Quantum Admittance (QA), proposing gravity as an outcome of energy flow through time, bridging General Relativity and quantum mechanics. QA’s simplicity offers a novel perspective on gravity, revolutionizing our understanding of fundamental forces.
Thesis:
Quantum Admittance redefines gravity as the acceleration of energy resulting from increasing density compressing ε0μ0 fields, presenting a paradigm shift in our understanding of gravitational dynamics.
Background:
General Relativity describes gravity as a curvature of spacetime. Like GR, QA proposes that gravity isn’t a pulling force, but rather a consequence of acceleration of energy flow in time. This insight raises the single question then:
What is gravity?
To answer it, we’re faced with a perplexing trinity of interpretations:
Galileo — “Gravity is a force that acts on all objects, regardless of their mass.”
Newton — “Every particle attracts every other particle with a force proportional to the product of their masses.”
Einstein — “The curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of matter.”
Quantum Admittance offers a compelling alternative, suggesting that:
QA — “Gravity is the acceleration of energy due to increasing density compressing ε0μ0 fields.”
Quantum Admittance maintains that gravity has both an instantaneous component and a delayed component, attributed to the propagation of gravity waves. This dual-component view aligns with aspects of current theoretical physics and offers insights into the dynamics of gravitational interactions over cosmic scales.
Postulates:
This new idea posits energy flow, mediated by Quantum Admittance (QA), as the driving force behind gravity. Changes in energy flow create gravitational attraction, offering insights into cosmic dynamics:
Energy Flow: QA posits energy flow, not mass, as the driving force behind gravity. Changes in the rate of energy flow create the gravitational attraction.
Dual-Component Gravity: The theory proposes both instantaneous and delayed components to gravity, aligning with aspects of current theories and explaining long-range gravitational interactions.
Mathematics Derivation and Implications:
The Equivalence of Mass and Energy.
Einsteins famous equation formalizing the theory of Relativity. This equation shows energy and mass are equivalent and interchangeable. A foundational element of Quantum Admittance.
E=mc2
Where:
E represents energy
m represents mass
c represents the speed of light in a vacuum.
This equation shows energy and mass are equivalent and interchangeable
Rearranging the equation:
E/m = c2
Another fundamental tenet of Einstein’s Special Relativity was “equivalent” gravity – the idea that gravity is not a force but the result of acceleration.
Since energy is constant by the law of conservation of energy, in the above equation, mass of an object is the inverse of c2 – Equivalent gravity is the acceleration of mass as seen in changes of c2. This is shown in the equation below:
Gv = dc2/ dx
Where:
Gv represents the rate of acceleration or “Equivalent gravity.”
dc2 represents the change in speed of “Equivalent mass.”
dx represents the change in time or distance.
Experimental Evidence
Using observations from the Pound-Rebka experiment important clues about the various interpretations that can be gleaned are either the speed of energy is changed or the time between the points where it is measured must be changed to show the difference in the frequency of energy observed.
It is noted that the difference in frequency of energy is EXACTLY that a change in the speed of energy would manifest. It appears the as if the speed of light is changed according to that of a massif it were dropped or launched along the same path.
Under relativity, the observed “blueshift” in energy is attributed to a change in time. The clocks at the top and bottom run at different frequencies.
Under QA, the observed “blueshift” in energy is attributed to a change in the speed of energy. The wavelength is stretched by gravity.
There is strong proof that one or the other is correct. The different interpretations have not been proved let alone tested. That is a goal of this project.
A “Working Assumption” of QA is this energy shift is due to a change in speed of energy as it has been modeled exhaustivly and fount to solve the many problems found as a result of GR’s limitations. To this end. we add the following coupling of energy to its environment as supporting evidence.
Coupling to the Mechanism: The Quantum Lattice
Maxwell’s equation for the speed of energy (c) states:
c2 = 1 / μ0ε0
Where:
c2 represents the speed of energy
ε0 represents Permittivity in the surrounding field
μ0 represents Permeability in the surrounding the field.
Referencing E/m = c2, when E is constant, any change in mass results in a change of μ0ε0. Likewise any change in μ0ε0 results in a change in mass.
Note: in this equation even the term c2 is correct for acceleration.
The next link to the concept of gravity being linked to the properties of the Quantum Lattice is the relation of the parameters μ0ε0 to the Impdeance of free space, Z0. This equation is shown below:
Z0 = √(μ0 / ε0)
Its inverse is Quantum Admittance:
Y0 = √(ε0 / μ0)
This the ability to accept energy in time, and is foundational to the remainder of this project
Proof:
The validation of Quantum Admittance hinges on its ability to withstand rigorous scrutiny and empirical testing, particularly when compared against the well-established framework of General Relativity. While acknowledging the validity of General Relativity’s proofs within its own paradigm, QA introduces a paradigm shift by proposing an alternative explanation for observed phenomena. Central to this assertion are several lines of evidence, each offering insights into the compatibility and explanatory power of QA. By examining explicit experimental validations, alignment with astronomical observations, and concordance with existing experiments, we can assess the robustness of Quantum Admittance and its potential to reshape our understanding of gravitational dynamics.
Quantum Admittance withstands scrutiny against General Relativity’s established proofs: This demonstrates its validity within its own theoretical framework. QA acknowledges that General Relativity has provided valid proofs within the framework of its own principles. However, it introduces a novel perspective by suggesting that the observed phenomena traditionally attributed to space-time warping could also arise from changes in the speed of energy within the Quantum Admittance framework.
Explicit proof is shown with the Pound-Rebka experiment: This experiment showed that energy is exactly accelerated at the speed of gravitational attraction. Originally designed to test relativity, the experimenters concluded that this proof was inconclusive for that case. Experiments by ZILA, show the relationship of altitude to energy with extreme accuracy with single electron oscillation periods differing at individual elevations within adjacent atoms. Occam’s razor prevails.
Alignment with Astronomical Observations: QA seeks validation through alignment with recent observations from telescopes like James Webb, potentially revealing new insights into the behavior of gravity at large scales.
Concordance with Existing Experiments: Predictions made by QA are compared with established experimental results, such as gravitational wave detection by LIGO. This comparison helps asses the theory’s potential to explain the two speeds of gravity phenomena, the field and the refresh of the field by the changing energy concentrations.
Predictions:
Quantum Admittance provides insights into various cosmic phenomena, such as the size and age of the universe and the quantization of gravity, challenging conventional notions and offering a unified understanding of fundamental forces:
Age of the universe: With constant processing of energy to maintain equilibrium, the universe may be an ongoing mechanism that defies a measure of its beginning.
Size of Universe: Likewise, without a time limit on the age of the universe there is no limit of size. the universe is not bound by a predetermined size.
Quantization of gravity: By unifying gravity with the quantum world, QA offers a framework for understanding the quantization of gravity. This framework bridges the gap between microscopic quantum phenomena and the macroscopic effects of a gravitational acceleration based on energy, offering a unified understanding of the fundamental forces governing the universe.
Big bang: With the “gathering capability” of Quantum Admittance there is no need for a big bang to start the universe by having all of the elements originate from a singularity. There is evidence of possible events which may appear is as vestiges of the reverse, the big “whoosh.”
Expansion: Without the Big Bang, the need for expansion to explain the size and redshift in no longer required, QA explains the redshift as the result of the energy, gravity, and entropy process.
Challenges:
Verifying Quantum Admittance presents challenges due to the difficulty in distinguishing its predictions from those of General Relativity, particularly when employing atomic clocks as measuring instruments. Both theories offer explanations for observed phenomena, such as changes in the speed of time, making it challenging to discern between them using current experimental methods. Atomic clocks, reliant on the properties of ε0 and μ0, exhibit variations consistent with both theories, complicating the differentiation process. As a result, QA faces the obstacle of demonstrating its unique predictive power and explanatory capacity amidst the backdrop of established gravitational theories.
Conclusion:
Quantum Admittance departs from the complexity of traditional gravitational theories. Its streamlined approach, rooted in the principle of Occam’s razor, offers a concise yet profound explanation for gravity’s mysteries. Unlike the expansive works of Newton and Einstein, QA prioritizes simplicity without sacrificing depth.
While Newton’s Principia and Einstein’s General Relativity are monumental works in the annals of physics, Quantum Admittance presents a refreshingly concise thesis. It adheres to the principle of Occam’s razor, asserting that the simplest explanation is often the most accurate. Just as a well-crafted theorem requires no embellishment, QA’s succinct formulation belies its profound implications.
By focusing on fundamental principles, Quantum Admittance provides a clear framework for understanding gravitational forces. Its implications extend beyond theoretical speculation, offering potential insights into cosmic phenomena. As we continue to explore the universe, QA invites us to reassess our understanding of gravity with clarity and rigor.