Home

Charge Admittance: A New Framework for Gravity

What Is Gravity?

The Core Thesis

For centuries, gravity has been defined by mass — or the bending of spacetime.

But what if it’s something else?

What if gravity arises because energy slows down as it passes through a field shaped by accelerated charge?

In Charge Admittance gravity happens when energy fields propagate at changing speeds.
Energy slows either because the path gets shallower — or it goes out of quadrature – the wheels go out of round.

This is the foundation of Charge Admittance (CA):

A framework that sees gravity not as a force or a warp —

but as a consequence of how field properties shape energy propagation.

Mini Concepts:

Gravity Without Mass

Galileo was right. Gravity doesn’t care about mass. What if mass was never the cause?

Time Doesn’t Bend — Energy Slows

Relativity says time stretches.

But what if it’s the energy propagation rate that changes — not time itself?

Charge Comes First

Charge is the smallest known carrier of energy.

It may be the seed of all structure — not mass, not time.

Constants Aren’t Constant

\varepsilon_0 and \mu_0 are shaped by the local coherence of the field.

They set the speed of light as c = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0} — but they are not fixed.

The Field Pushes Back

What if gravity is just a gradient of admittance —

a change in how easily energy can move?

The Framework

Charge Admittance (CA) proposes that:

  • The vacuum is not empty, but fields of fluctuating charge potential.
  • Gravity emerges from gradients in how these fields transmit energy.
  • g_v = -\frac{d_c}{d_x} — gravity is the spatial gradient of energy speed.
  • The so-called “constants” are locally emergent from charge-driven coherence.
  • The Fine Structure Constant (\alpha) signals the point where accelerated charges come into existence.

Rewriting the Cosmos: The CA View of the Universe

If charge gradients govern gravity, then the same principles apply cosmically.

The Charge Admittance model reshapes our cosmological assumptions:

Traditional AssumptionCA Gravity Interpretation
Big Bang originNo singular start — structure arises from local coherent condensations
Cosmic inflationNot needed — large-scale structure emerges via field self-organization
Universe has a defined sizeNo size limit — coherence defines extent, not boundaries
Universe has a set ageTimeless — energy evolves within local coherence domains
Black holes are singularitiesNo true singularities — compression halts at coherence breakdown, not zero radius
Event horizons are absoluteNo permanent loss — all energy is retained within field reachability
One origin of matter/energyLocal emergence from field conditions, not a single creation event

Begin Exploration

  • Charge Admittance for Dummies: A plain-language entry point to the CA framework.
  • History: From Galileo’s falling spheres to Einstein’s warped spacetime, gravity has long been linked to mass.
  • The Mystery of Gravity: We’re told gravity is the curvature of spacetime, but it might be related to the tilt of gradients.
  • Gravity Today: From falling apples to the redshift of distant galaxies, each observation refined our tools.
  • A Universe Shaped by Charge, Not Mass: “The first jerk” — acceleration of charge — generated coherent energy flow.
  • Resonance Ratio: Introducing a new Ratio ζ (Z02) in Charge Admittance: Allows energy waves travel at any speed
  • Predictions: CA interprets gravitational waves not as spacetime ripples, but as emergent behaviors.
  • Proofs: CA withstands existing empirical scrutiny. It aligns with observed data but reinterprets outcomes.
  • Experiments: What was once explained via curvature or quantum abstraction now becomes testable.

Summary

This framework isn’t metaphysics. It’s a return to grounding — where logic comes first, and math formalizes it second. CA retains what works in existing theory and reshapes what doesn’t. Its implications are broad. Its tools are accessible. The door is open.

Disruptive? Absolutely: But necessary. For over a century, physics has described the models — not the mechanism. CA offers the missing framework. One where constants aren’t assumed — they’re explained.

This isn’t outreach. It’s architecture.
The goal is to write the idea clearly enough that it can walk on its own — or fall cleanly. Others can do what they will with it.
The work is its own reward.