An Old Human Measurememt Standard Becomes a Variable in a New Theory
Explanation
Einstein proposed using time as a variable to warp space-time, conforming to his theory of general relativity to explain “gravity.” His idea was that mass warped time to bend space, validated by “mind experiments” suggesting time behaves differently when measured in motion.
Several issues are noteworthy with this reasoning. Firstly, time is a human-made construct, like meters or miles, serving as a standardized unit for measuring events, scheduling activities, and quantifying productivity. Ironically, the idea of unified time was to coordinate human activity after motion, such as long train rides. In the absence of human intelligence, the concept of time loses its significance.
Time is not just a physical quantity but also a social construct with a profound impact on our lives. It has been essential for our development as a species, allowing us to coordinate activities, share a common understanding of the world, and advance in science, technology, and culture. Further, there is no proof that time is a variable. The only reason time is considered a variable is if we let it. If time is a variable, what are the constants it is based on, and what is the equation that relates it to mass?
There is no single natural clock in the universe. The passage of a “universal” frequency standard would be affected by factors like the gravitational pull of other objects, the expansion of the universe, and the quantum nature of reality. Consequently, finding a single, unified timekeeping mechanism for the entire universe is unlikely. Further, there is not one scientific instrument that changes the speed of time as a functional adjustment.