Charge Admittance’s Theory’s explanation for gravity has significant consequences that impact our understanding of the structure and behavior of the universe. It offers explanations for phenomena that are currently not well understood. This new perspective opens up possibilities for fresh insights into long-regarded theories. While it is folly to depend on any model to 100% predict the future, it is likely that some may be more adept than others at predicting a range of possibilities. Using the CA Theory as a guide, here are a few ideas about the future:
Space Telescopes
The CA Theory has made accurate predictions that align with the observations of the Hubble and James Webb telescopes, providing insights into the broader cosmos. Notably, it explains gravitational waves as a consequence of energy rebalancing, as demonstrated by the detections made by LIGO. An intriguing finding from LIGO is the ability of gravitational energy to traverse frame borders, similar to electromagnetic energy. This further supports CA with the revelation that both EM energy and gravity waves move at the same speed.
The Speed of Energy
The CA Paradigm predicts that the speed of energy, or the baseline speed of light, might vary under different gravitational conditions. Using earth based closed circuit measurements showing a speed of energy at 299,792,458.26 m/s Z0 formulas place the speed of energy at the far reaches of empty space at 299,792,466.68 m/s.
Testing this hypothesis on the moon or in locations with varying gravitational accelerations, such as mountain tops, could reveal differences in the speed of light compared to our Earth-based measurements. These variations are anticipated based on the concept that gravitational acceleration influences the tilt or gradient in space, affecting the speed of energy. This prediction opens the door for experimental exploration beyond the confines of our planet, providing an exciting opportunity to further validate the CA’s insights into the nature of gravity and its impact on the fabric of spacetime.
The Big Bang
CA Theory is a new theory of gravity that aligns with general relativity’s space-time curvature without relying on singularities to explain the universe’s origins. Our current understanding of the universe is limited, as what we perceive is likely only a minute fraction of the vast expanse of space and time.
In the context of an infinite space and time, we are left uncertain about whether the visible universe is reflective of the entirety of space, as it fails to adequately explain observed timelines and activities. The universe can exhibit its current structure without originating from a single point.
Galaxy Formation
Galaxies are structures that evolve from quantum dipoles. Their formation is individual and mutually exclusive of any universe-wide event, such as the big bang. This insight emerges from the progression of expanding connections of quantum dipoles, reflecting a fundamental aspect of the Charge Admittance framework.
Galaxy Gradients
Galaxies as structures have energy gradients from their outer edge to their dense centers. These gradients regulate the speed of energy flow. At the outer edges of galaxies the energy floe is the highest approaching the free space limit designated as c. (this “c” is not the c measured here on earth but rather that calculated by the c at infinite distance from the surface of the earth. Be aware that energy seen from galaxies shows a tendency to be an average.
Reassessing Expansion
According to CA, gravitational lensing and energy interactions lead to progressive redshift as energy travels through space. This model is consistent with the hypothesis that longer distances result in more interactions and a stronger redshift. This implies that the existing structure of the cosmos may be explained without the presence of dark matter and energy. One can reassess the conventional theory of the universe’s redshift-induced expansion.
The reduced energy of light from distant objects may not solely be caused by Doppler shift, necessitating alternative explanations for what we observe.
The Endless Universe
New and refined observations challenge some of our prevailing theories about the functioning of the universe, prompting us to question the accuracy of current observational methods. As our measurement capabilities improve, increasing sensitivity and bandwidth, it becomes evident that space has no physical limit, and there is no evidence supporting the existence of boundaries or times of origin.
Our current measurement capabilities lack a definitive reference, making it difficult to confirm some cosmological “constants,” traditionally represented by the speed of light (c). Moreover, the notion of an infinite and boundless cosmos within our perspective raises questions about the accuracy of certain features, such as observed abnormalities that have led to hypotheses involving extra (black) mass or energy.
Age of the Universe
CA Theory offers a paradigm-shifting perspective on the age of the universe. In this novel framework, the universe needs not to confined by a fixed age; rather, as an ongoing process where new structures and galaxies can continuously form. This departure from the traditional concept challenges us to rethink our understanding of cosmic timelines and the intricate interplay between energy, matter, and the evolution of the universe.
Size of Universe
Just as CA challenges conventional notions of the universe’s age, it also introduces a radical reimagining of its size. According to this model, the universe is not bound by a predetermined size, and the emergence of new structures and galaxies is an ever-present possibility. This dynamic perspective encourages us to envision a universe in a constant state of creation, where the boundaries of cosmic expansion are continually reshaped by the interplay of energy and space.
The Journey of Energy Through Space
CA Theory intricately explores the concept of energy sidebands generated through deflection. These sidebands, responsible for both redshift and blueshift, accumulate over time via gravitational focusing and direct energy acceleration and deceleration. This explanation offers a unique perspective on the phenomenon of particle fusion on one side and redshift on the other.
Gravity’s Dual Nature
CA theory’s exploration of gravity illuminates its dual nature, comprising static and dynamic effects. For static scenarios, objects with energy are subject to the “in situ” Z0 field, resulting in instantaneous gravitational influence.
Gravitational waves and equilibrium
In contrast, dynamic gravitational effects arise from the evolving Z0 field due to energy balancing, particularly through the propagation of gravitational waves as seen by LIGO. This perspective unveils the intricate complexity of gravity, where variations in energy density and speed create temporal disparities for different observers.
Unveiling the Uncharted Spectrum
Perhaps the most captivating prediction of the CA is the existence of an uncharted spectrum of energy beyond the realms of electromagnet waves and particles. This tantalizing proposition challenges us to expand our understanding of the universe’s fundamental fabric and explore the unexplored frontiers of energy that may hold the keys to unlocking the “dark” mysteries of existence itself. A third range of energy between the most energetic particles is in the realm of frequencies that begin to show quantum values.
The Big Bang Is Not The Origination of the Universe
A noble lie is a myth or untruth, often but not invariably of a religious nature, knowingly propagated by an elite to maintain social harmony or to advance an agenda. The noble lie is a concept originated by Plato, as described in The Republic.
Msgr Georges Lemaitre’s Big Bang extrapolated expansion back in time to find the origin of the universe. It predicted a beginning of the universe at a time about 13.7 billion years ago. While widely accepted, some discrepancies are noted in this scenario. These are singularities and an anomalous bump in the rate of expansion.
One perspective aligns with the notion that the principles governing the universe, including the laws of physics, remain consistent across time and space. From this viewpoint, the Big Bang represents a unique manifestation of these universal laws, initiating the expansion and evolution of the cosmos as we know it. The singularity at the heart of the Big Bang may be seen as a point where these laws were fully operational, giving rise to the subsequent unfolding of cosmic phenomena.
The concept of the Big Bang, in the context of the “law of universality,” poses intriguing philosophical inquiries. The law of universality suggests that fundamental principles governing the universe apply uniformly across all spatial scales. In this light, the Big Bang theory, which posits a singular event marking the origin of the universe, raises questions about the universality of physical laws and the nature of cosmic evolution.
Likewise, The Big Bang, fails the “law of universality,” across all temporal scales. In this light, the Big Bang theory, as now understood requires different laws to be applied across the span of time. This is a double failure for the the Big Bang which in this lights turns out to be a Big Bamboozle.
“While the Big Bang is one way to imagine a singularity it is more likely to be a way to multiply by zero.” – Rod Mack
The Age of the Universe is Not 13.7 billion Years old
Based solely on the redshift seen using Hubble’s findings, The universe is estimated to be 13.7 billion years old, notwithstanding the observations of objects made earlier, specifically the Methuselah star, which is measured at 14.5 million years according to its redshift.
Then there was JWST which proves this impossible based on current theory. Oops…
The Universe is Not Expanding
Doppler shifts observed in frequencies of star light have been interpreted to show the universe is expanding. There is no alternate explanation accepted for the Doppler shift observed. Based on this, the information age and size of the universe are a recent event. There is some question on viability of this based on the following alternatives:
1. Expansion of the universe based on a singularity at the beginning is non-linear.
2. The early expansion of the universe could have stretched the light waves that we are seeing.
3. Entropy from bending as light travels through variations in the admittance of space (Y0) could also be a cause.
Based on recent telescopic data from space, the more plausible explanation is number 3. Entropy is caused by gravitational bending. There is NO proof that Doppler is the only reason for the shifts in frequencies of light we see from the heavens. There is only hope that “it may be” in order to confirm a perception to support a religious belief. Lastly, there is the problem of colliding galaxies if the universe is expanding. It is a far stretch to believe….
Summary
As we conclude this journey through the predictions and implications set forth by Charge Admittance models, we find ourselves at the crossroads of discovery. This perspective invites us to question the necessity of dark matter and dark energy to explain cosmic organization. Instead, it presents an intriguing proposition: the universe’s current structure could be a result of its inherent dynamics, obviating the need for a single-point origin. By embracing this alternative explanation, we gain fresh insights into the enigmatic nature of gravity, the quantization of energy, and its intricate interconnections.