Thesis

A Foundational Framework for Electromagnetic and Gravitational Dynamics

Abstract

This paper introduces the Charge Admittance (CA) framework, proposing that the speed of energy propagation, traditionally defined as the speed of light , is not a universal constant but a derived property contingent on local electromagnetic field parameters: permittivity and permeability . Challenging prevailing assumptions embedded in relativity and the SI system, CA reframes as a function of dynamic space, responsive to local field density and structure. It unifies electromagnetic, gravitational, and quantum effects through a field-responsive lens and introduces the Standard Earth Electromagnetic Parameter (SEEP) model as a terrestrial reference framework. Computational simulations further demonstrate how forward and reverse modeling of gravitational potential correlates with changes in ε0 and μ0, culminating in a new interpretation of event horizons and galactic structure.

Introduction

Modern physics enshrines the speed of light as a cornerstone constant. However, historical experiments and Maxwell’s derivations suggest a deeper mechanism: c = 1/√μ0ε0. The Charge Admittance model posits that and are not fixed in all space but vary with gravitational and electromagnetic context. This offers a new interpretation of energy propagation, decoupled from spacetime curvature and rooted instead in variable field impedance.

Foundations of Charge Admittance (CA)

CA begins with reinterpreting the electromagnetic impedance of free space:

    \[ Z_0 = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\varepsilon_0}} \qquad \text{and} \qquad c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\varepsilon_0 \mu_0}} \]

Where these quantities vary, so too must c. Energy propagation is regulated by the local admittance:

    \[ Y_0 = \frac{1}{Z_0} \]

This reframing views space not as a passive void but as an active medium whose local properties determine how energy moves. SEEP is introduced as the Earth-local baseline for ε0 and μ0, akin to STP in chemistry.

Field Variability and the Speed of Energy

In CA, electromagnetic waves slow or accelerate depending on field density. This is modeled with altitude and gravitational potential as proxy variables. Charge (as a leading carrier of energy) travels faster than the EM wavefront it induces; the wavefront is slowed by the inductive/magnetic drag governed by . Thus, energy deposition speed (light) becomes a function of how energy interacts with its surrounding field structure.

Computational Modeling: Forward and Reverse Propagation

We present Python simulations tracing the behavior of across a range of altitudes, showing it asymptotically increasing with distance from gravitational sources. A reverse model demonstrates that as gravitational field density increases, , aligning with black hole boundary conditions and redefining the event horizon not as a singularity but as a field-density barrier. These models also suggest a possible maximum c ≈ 1.0005% at intergalactic distances.

Implications and Predictions

  • Event horizons are electromagnetic, not mass-bound.
  • Variable resolves anomalies in gravitational redshift and wave decay.
  • Photons may have a limited range of coherence in low-density space.
  • Energy condensation zones (dust clouds, galaxy arms) emerge from field noise density exceeding signal thresholds.

Philosophical and Physical Repercussions

CA proposes a foundational shift: energy speed is the governing metric of reality, not static spacetime. The dynamic ε0 and μ0 replace curvature as the cause of gravitational effects. The concept of a “vacuum” as a uniform baseline evaporates; instead, space is a rich field matrix where energy navigates by local impedance.

The Entanglement Horizon

Emerging from the CA framework is a hypothesis that places an upper bound on entanglement distance — a coherence limit dictated by the vacuum’s ability to support discernible dipolar field symmetry. When the energy wavelength becomes so long that charge separation cannot be maintained above vacuum noise, coherent coupling fails, and entanglement collapses. This suggests that:

    \[ d_{\text{max, entangle}} \approx \lambda_{\text{max, coherent dipole}} \]

This horizon may define a physical boundary beyond which entangled systems decohere, not by measurement, but by thermal stochasticity and field incapacity. This proposal is now expanded in the linked supplementary paper: “The Entanglement Horizon: Coherence Limits in a Charge-Admittance Universe”.

Conclusion

Charge Admittance restores observational primacy to physics, repositioning the speed of light as a contingent outcome of local field characteristics. This opens new directions in cosmology, black hole theory, and quantum coherence. Future work will focus on refining the reverse model, integrating ZPE influences, and exploring possible experimental confirmations of variable.