Is it Possible Current Theory Has it Wrong on Space-Time Gravity?
We’re faced with a perplexing trinity of interpretations:
Galileo — “Gravity is an acceleration that acts on all objects, regardless of their mass.”
Newton — “Every particle attracts every other particle with a force proportional to the product of their masses.”
Einstein — “The curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of matter.”
And, now one unifying solution:
Charge Admittance — “Gravity is acceleration of energy due to changing gradients in the permeability (μ0) and permittivity (ε0) fields.”
CA aligns with Galileo’s observations: Gravitational acceleration is independent of mass. His experiments with inclined planes demonstrated that objects of different masses experience the same rate of acceleration in a gravitational field. In the CA framework, this equality arises naturally: gravitational effects are not a function of mass per se but are instead dictated by energy flow dynamics by the “tilt” of the μ0ε0 field lattice. Galileo’s findings presaged this more comprehensive view of gravity, which divorces gravitational acceleration from the mass of an object and grounds it in universal principles of energy propagation.
Gravity Redefined: The Role of Energy Flow in Shaping the Cosmos
Charge Admittance (CA) introduces a transformative approach to gravity, diverging from spacetime curvature, gravity arises not from mass density distorting time flow but from the energy flow towards equilibrium shaped by gradients in permeability (μ0) and permittivity (ε0) of its fields. By combining Einstein’s E=mc2 with Maxwell’s c = 1/√μ0ε0, CA reveals that these electromagnetic field parameters form a dynamic lattice which “density” governs the speed of energy propagation through time. Gravitational acceleration emerges from μ0ε0 gradients, which define the vector of energy flow, whether in free space or bound within mass:
Gv = – dc / dx
Where:
Gv represents the rate of gravitational acceleration.
dc represents the change in speed of energy.
dx represents the change in time distance.
This model marks a fundamental shift by grounding gravity in moderated energy flow governed by well-defined physical mechanisms, rather than GR’s reliance on mass-induced spacetime curvature and unverified constructs. CA eliminates the need for hypothetical entities like gravitons or singularities, instead emphasizing the universe’s structure as shaped by a vast sea of electromagnetic radiation, a continuous field of photon energies. By relying on rigorously tested, mathematically grounded principles foundational to current technological applications, CA offers a streamlined, experimentally anchored understanding of gravity. Learn More →
For First Time Visitors: “It’s About Energy, Not Mass!”
Charge Admittance for Beginners: offers a quick review if you’re new to the concepts of charge, energy, and their interplay within the universe. This user-friendly introduction simplifies complex ideas, helping you understand how space, time, energy, and gravity are interconnected. It’s the perfect starting point to grasp the foundational principles before diving deeper into our detailed thesis.
The journey begins with CA, exploring how charge may represent the universe’s first quantum form of energy. This initial emergence reframes particles not as discrete entities but as dynamic energy constructs, shaped by the properties of time and charge. In this foundational phase, the principles of energy flow take precedence, much like a wind setting out across the vast landscape of time.
The Fundamental Distinction Between Charge Admittance (CA) and General Relativity (GR)
At the heart of Charge Admittance lies a single, pivotal distinction from General Relativity: the choice of the parameter responsible for warping space.
General Relativity (GR) posits that spacetime curvature arises due to mass altering the speed of time.
Charge Admittance (CA) proposes that space curvature results from energy changing speed as it traverses a “lumpy” μ0ε0 field, which determines the speed of energy in the time domain.
Although both models yield equivalent mathematical and experimental predictions, they diverge fundamentally in their interpretation of the mechanism driving these phenomena. This distinction carries profound implications for our understanding of gravity, lensing, redshift, and the fabric of the universe.
Logic Supporting the Charge Admittance Framework
The practical logic behind Charge Admittance strengthens its plausibility:
Established Variability of Energy Speed: The concept of variable energy speed, as governed by the μ0ε0 lattice, underpins countless real-world applications—ranging from electromagnetic theory to advanced engineering systems. This extensive empirical foundation suggests that energy speed variability is a tangible and practical phenomenon.
Lack of Practical Applications for Variable Time Speed: In contrast, the notion of time’s speed varying as a direct result of mass lacks empirical utility. Despite its theoretical elegance, there are no known technological or experimental frameworks that employ the manipulation of time speed for practical purposes.
By grounding itself in the observable and the actionable, Charge Admittance builds on the logical foundation that variability in the speed of energy, rather than the speed of time, is the more plausible mechanism for the observed curvature of space.
AI Chimes In.
ChatGPT Gets IT! By recognizing how dipole interactions over vast distances explain gravitational attraction and energy density, ChatGPT pinpointed a key insight: these interactions drive the cosmic evolution of energy itself. This moment clarified a crucial link between localized energy structures, like galaxies, and the larger, interconnected fabric of the universe.
“I can see how important and transformative your work is—it’s taking us beyond conventional physics and toward a deeper understanding of the energy fabric of the cosmos”.
Rev. date: 1/10/25 R.M.