Charge Admittance – Committed to honest inquiry, without bias of science for money.

What is Charge Admittance?

Modern physics treats spacetime as the fixed arena in which all physical phenomena unfold. But what if spacetime itself is not fundamental—what if it emerges from deeper, energy-time processes?

Charge Admittance A field-based theory of gravity and space where energy, not mass, shapes motion and structure.

Introduction

Charge Admittance (CA) offers a shift in perspective: space is not empty or passive, but a structured, energy-sensitive lattice—a dynamic field with stiffness, density, and directional impedance. This lattice isn’t shaped by energy—it governs how energy moves, binds, and interacts.

In this view:

Mass isn’t the source of gravity—it’s the result of energy trapped, as standing waves, in low-admittance regions of the field.
Gravity, light, inertia, and redshift don’t arise from curved geometry, but from real, measurable variations in the field’s permittivity (ε₀) and permeability (μ₀).
The speed of light is not a universal constant—it reflects the local state of the field.

CA For Beginners We’re not extending General Relativity, we’re replacing its geometric metaphors with mechanisms.

Rethinking the Fundamentals

The understanding of gravity has undergone profound transformations, marked by three pivotal conceptual frameworks that define its evolution through the ages.

Galileo: Gravity acts equally on all bodies, regardless of mass.
Newton: Gravity is a force of attraction between masses.
Einstein: Gravity is the curvature of spacetime induced by mass.

Each model describes gravitational effects within a certain scope, but none fully unifies fundamental forces or resolves anomalies like dark matter, dark energy, or galactic rotation curves.

CA For Thinkers Energy, Not Mass: The Hidden Driver of Gravity

The Lattice and Field-Governed Propagation

The vacuum of space is not empty—it is a structured, resistive medium filled with energy, charges, particles, dust, and mass. This medium—called the Ξ-lattice—has measurable density and stiffness that dictate how energy moves and condenses.

High Ξ regions High field coupling. Favor condensation (mass), resist propagation (gravitational wells).
Low Ξ regions Low field cohesion. Energy spreads freely, no binding (voids or cosmic acceleration).

Mass is not fundamental—it is energy trapped in a stable, high-Ξ configuration: a complex standing wave or “field knot.” Similarly, photon formation depends not on emission from particles, but on local Ξ conditions that support waveform coherence.

In this model, waveform shape is not an afterthought—it encodes the local Ξ-field conditions, offering a real-time probe into the structure of the vacuum.

The Lattice Makes gravity, time, and mass consequences of energy’s behavior real, not mathematical abstractions.

Field Relationships that Redefine Constants

Classical physics treats these as fixed and separate:

Maxwell Propagation Speed: Shows how wave velocity is set by local field density.

$c^2 = \frac{1}{\mu_0 \varepsilon_0}$

Mass-Energy Equivalence: Mass is energy bound within a resistive field lattice.

$E = mc^2$

But Charge Admittance sees them as emergent properties of field stiffness and density. When the field varies, so does the energy response:

CA Gravitational Gradient: Gravity as directional flow down the c-field gradient—not a force from mass.

$g_v = -\frac{dc}{dx}$

Gravity in a New Light This relation isn’t a metaphor, it’s a measurement. Gravity isn’t a pull from mass, but a descent along an energy slope defined by the local speed of light.

CA explains

The Charge Admittance model reshapes foundational cosmology:

Why the speed of light has the value it does—not arbitrary, but arising from the fundamental structure of spacetime.
Why electromagnetic energy exhibits both wave-like and particle-like behavior—revealing the underlying unity of quantum fields.
Why electromagnetic energy exhibits both wave-like and particle-like behavior—revealing the underlying unity of quantum fields.
Why electromagnetic waves propagate in coherent packets—governed by constraints of quantization and phase stability.
Why gravity is not truly constant—tracing fluctuations to deeper interactions within the fabric of space and energy.
Why charge and mass appear quantized—hinting at deeper symmetries in the underlying field theory.
Why time moves forward—driven by asymmetries in information and entropy flow.
Why measurement affects the system—revealing the participatory nature of reality at quantum scales.

Featured Insight

Quantum Revisited: What if Planck’s famous equation, E = hf isn’t the base unit of energy, but a statistical illusion—a smooth average that masks a deeper mechanism of slope-driven energy transfer?
In this landmark reframe, we return to Planck’s blackbody roots and re-express quantum energy as a function of local dipole dynamics, not frequency packets. It’s not just a new view of quantum—it’s a unification of local and bulk energy, tied to gravity, redshift, and vacuum structure.

CA Predicts

No Big Bang origin: The universe evolves through local, cyclical condensations—without requiring a singular explosive beginning.
No dark matter or dark energy: Galactic dynamics and cosmological redshift arise from gradients in Ξ fields, not unseen substances.
No spacetime curvature: All apparent gravitational motion emerges from local variations in Ξ—dispensing with geometric warping.
Redshift is not Doppler-based: It reflects thermodynamic modulation of field states over cosmic distances, not recessional velocity.
CMB is not a relic of origin: It represents a resonant thermal equilibrium—a standing background shaped by ongoing universal processes.
No singularities in black holes: These are not infinite curvatures, but stable, high-Ξ confinement zones with definable structure.
Cosmic structure is field-driven: Large-scale order arises from self-organizing field interactions, not initial conditions or inflation.
Expansion is an emergent illusion: The appearance of cosmic expansion results from Ξ-field evolution, not literal metric stretching.
Time is a fixed metric: Is apparent variability arises from changes in the speed at which energy propagates through varying Ξ fields.
Gravitation is entropic tension: Apparent attraction results from directional flow within Ξ gradients, not force or geometry.

Foundational Reframes

What if

ε₀ and μ₀ are not constants—they are properties of a self, structured field that can vary in density?
c is not constant, but locally variable due to field density?
Planck’s constant was built on statistical ensembles, not a discrete energy quantum?
Energy steers mass, not the other way around?
Spacetime isn’t the stage, but the performance?
The universe didn’t begin, it is ongoing and the parts of it we see and feel are made from condensed charges seen as energy?
The universe is not expanding, it does not have a size limit?

Summary: A Field-Based Gravitational Mechanism

Concept	Classical View	Charge Admittance View
Gravity Source	Mass	Local energy density in field
Redshift	Photon loses energy	Wave slows in high-ε₀μ₀ region
Spacetime	Geometric curvature	Physical field lattice
c (speed of light)	Constant	Emergent from local field
ε₀, μ₀	Fixed constants	Local properties of space

Have thoughts, questions, or a challenge to the theory?

Join the discussion →