**Perspective**

Before delving into detailed proofs, it’s pertinent to examine the notion that the speed of energy plays a crucial role. By using charge to alter the speed of energy, a minute change of only 5.79E-19 in ε_{0} with a proportional change in μ_{0} (μ_{0}/ε_{0} Wave Resonance Constant) yields the gravitational acceleration observed at the Earth’s surface.

**Relativity Proofs**

**Charge Admittance withstands scrutiny against established proofs**: This demonstrates its validity within its own theoretical framework. CA acknowledges that General Relativity has provided valid proofs within the framework of its own principles. However, it introduces a novel perspective by suggesting that the observed phenomena traditionally attributed to space-time warping could also arise from changes in the speed of energy within the CA framework.

**Quantum Admittance Proofs**

This paper presents a novel perspective on the nature of the permittivity (ε_{0}) and permeability (μ_{0}) of free space, demonstrating that these fundamental constants are not inherent properties of space itself, but rather emergent from the energy that interacts with it. By exploring the concept of admittance (Y_{0}) and its connection to the energy underlying electromagnetic phenomena, this work challenges the traditional view of ε_{0} and μ_{0} as fixed characteristics of a static vacuum. Instead, it proposes that these constants arise through the dynamic interactions of dipole moments, such as those found in photons, and that space is a consequence of these energy interactions rather than a pre-existing medium. This “Y_{0} Proof” thus provides a compelling argument for rethinking the role of space in the propagation of electromagnetic waves and offers a foundation for further exploration into the emergent nature of physical constants.

“The Z0 Proof” presents a bold re-evaluation of gravity, asserting that mass is irrelevant to gravitational effects. Building on the insights of the Pound-Rebka experiment, the paper argues that gravity is not an interaction between masses but an acceleration of energy. Through this energy-centric lens, the speed of energy is shown to change with lensing, suggesting that gravity is a consequence of energy field dynamics, not mass. This challenges traditional mass-based gravitational models and offers new interpretations of phenomena such as redshift and gravitational lensing.

The G_{V} Proof presents a novel interpretation of gravity, arguing that it is not mass, but energy, that is subject to gravitational acceleration. This reinterpretation builds on the experimental findings of the Pound-Rebka experiment, which demonstrated that energy (in the form of light) is influenced by gravity, and a reanalysis of the Michelson-Morley experiment, where light’s constant speed was measured in a gravitationally neutral plane. By examining these pivotal experiments, the G_{V} Proof challenges traditional views and proposes that gravitational fields act directly on energy, providing a deeper understanding of gravity’s true nature.

The mathematical proof in “The Mathematical Proof” paper establishes a rigorous foundation for understanding gravitational acceleration within the framework of Quantum Admittance (QA) Theory. By revisiting and reinterpreting fundamental equations, such as E=mc^{2} and Maxwell’s equations, the proof elucidates how variations in the speed of light (c) and the electromagnetic properties of space (μ_{0} and ε_{0}) correlate with gravitational phenomena. The proof demonstrates that changes in energy density, reflected in the speed of energy (c^{2}), are integral to the behavior of gravitational fields, aligning with empirical observations like those from the Pound-Rebka experiment. This formalization not only reinforces the theoretical underpinnings of QA but also highlights its potential to offer novel insights into the nature of gravity, moving beyond conventional interpretations.

**Experimental Evidence**

**Pound-Rebka **experiment observed a redshift of light (decrease in frequency) with decreasing altitude at the same colorshift if it were the speed of energy changing. There observation:

*Gravity affects the speed of energy exactly as predicted by the QA gravitational constant.*

*“The shift observed agrees with -4.92×10-15, the predicted gravitational shift for this ‘two-way’ height difference.”*

This follows exactly QA’s positing variable space permittivity and permeability (ε_{0} and μ_{0}) changes the gravitational constant. Additionally, considering that photons are massless particles accelerate instantaneously with this change adds weight to this proof.

**Observtional Confirmation**

While general relativity has been extensively validated through experiments, the QA Theory meets these proofs by proposing a slightly different mechanism for the observed results of “curvature of space-time,” that is the “curvature of time-energy. This exchanges the “speed of energy” for the “speed of time” in general relativity while maintaining mathematical faithfulness to classical principles.

QA finds harmony with classical physics and existing empirical evidence. It adeptly elucidates cosmic phenomena without introducing additional constructs like new particles or dark matter.

**LIGO** has confirmed the presence of gravitational waves, as predicted by QA. Moreover, based on QA’s alternate explanation for redshift, the theory suggests that the universe may not be expanding as previously thought.

**JWST** observations showing new data about the age and size of the universe extremely large galaxies at much older times than previously considered possible align with QA. These were ** considered impossible** within the model of an expanding universe.

** JILA experiments** show that energy is exactly accelerated at the speed of gravitational attraction with extreme accuracy with single electron oscillation periods differing at individual elevations within adjacent atoms. These are the equivalent of accurate version of the Pound-Rebka Experiment carried out at the atomic level.

The fact that light (or photons) accelerate at the same rate as mass in a gravitational field is proof that * gravity is related to energy*, not mass as Galileo first observed This is ignored by both Newton’s and Einstein’s theories.

**Future Proofs**

As technology advances and our observational instruments become more sensitive, we gain an expanded bandwidth that allows us to peer deeper into the mysteries of the cosmos. Within this vast expanse lies an evolving frontier of energy dynamics, brimming with possibilities yet to be explored. One such intriguing prospect is the existence of larger concentrations of energy beyond the limits of our current observational capabilities. These hidden reservoirs of energy hold the potential to unravel cosmic mysteries, such as the enigmatic rapid expansion attributed to dark energy and the gravitational anomalies linked to dark matter.

The hypothesis of these unseen energy reservoirs presents a compelling avenue for future exploration. Although speculative, it offers a promising path toward understanding fundamental cosmic phenomena. Observational missions like the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), with its advanced capabilities, stand poised to provide unprecedented insights into these hidden realms of the cosmos, shedding light on their presence and properties.

Moreover, the emergence of mass is elegantly accommodated within the framework of QA Theory, which proposes that particles with mass arise from concentrated energy. This contrasts with mass-first theories and challenges conventional thinking by emphasizing the difficulties in explaining energy, forces, and particle organization if mass is considered the primary starting point.

QA Theory offers a unified understanding of gravity and other fundamental forces mediated by particle exchange, explaining phenomena such as gravitational waves as a result of energy equilibrium and entropy rebalancing. While still in development, QA aligns with a wide range of observations, including interferometer experiments and optical and gravitational wave-based studies.

**Occam’s Razor Prevails**

Occam’s Razor is a heuristic principle that states that the simplest explanation of a phenomenon is usually the correct one. QA is a relatively simple theory, but it is able to explain a wide range of complex phenomena. The simplicity, lack of mathematical complexity, and adherence to classical physics makes QA a promising candidate for a new theory of gravity.